MedNews

  • Drug Industry News
  • FDA News & Alerts
  • Health & Medical News
You are here: Home / Archives for Health & Medical News / Cancer

Lung Cancer Patient Response to Treatment May Be Predicted by Biomarkers

February 2, 2008 By MedNews Leave a Comment

Researchers at UCLA’s Jonsson Center, led by Dr. Steven Dubinett, have discovered biomarkers capable of predicting the response to a combination treatment by Celebrex and Tarceva by patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

It is believed that these findings may help oncologists avoid prescribing conventional treatments that don’t work, in favor of drugs to which they know patients will respond.

In 2008 more than 213,000 Americans will be diagnosed with lung cancer, and of these some 160,000 will die. If further studies confirm the findings of this first study, said Dr. Steven Dubinett, a professor of pulmonary and critical care medicine and senior author, this personalized drug therapy would offer a much-needed alternative therapy. "We need good predictors of response to targeted therapy in lung cancer so individual patients receive the specific therapy that targets the particular molecular abnormalities of their tumors," he said.

The Phase 1 dose-escalation study of the drug combination surveyed a group of patients for whom all other treatments had been unsuccessful. The tumors in 50% of the patients decreased by more than 30%, or had tumors that did not grow—described as stable disease.

When the UCLA team analyzed tumor, blood and urine samples to find out why some patients did so well, they found several biomarkers that could help identify patients likely to respond to the combination Celebrex and Tarceva therapy. The answer appeared to be in the levels of certain proteins in the patients’ blood: Dubinett said that changes in these proteins may help explain the potential benefit of Celebrex in making the tumor cells more vulnerable to Tarceva.

Cycloxygenase-2 (COX-2) is an enzyme that makes cancer cells resistant to death, and causes resistance to drugs like Tarceva, allowing the cancer to grow.

Dr. Dubinett and his team found that if they inhibited the COX-2 pathway, they could restore the sensitivity of lung cancer tumor cells to Tarceva. The samples from Phase 1 patients showed that patients with low levels of MMP9 before treatment responded best to the combination therapy.

If these findings are confirmed in larger studies, in the future that protein biomarker could be used to place patients into groups with patients having low blood levels of MMP9 receiving the Celebrex and Tarceva therapy and responding. A larger, multi-site Phase 11 study of 10 patients is now under way, to confirm if there is a connection between tumors that express the proteins named in the Phase 1 study and a response to combination treatment.

"This study cold determine whether these biomarkers can be used in the future before treatment to select the patients likely to respond," said Dr. Dubinett.

The findings of the study were published in the February 1, 2008 issue of the Journal of Thoracic Oncology.

Source: University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Health Sciences

Filed Under: Cancer Tagged With: cancer, celebrex, lung cancer, tarceva

Hormonal Components in Some Dietary Supplements May Promote Progression of Prostate Cancer

January 16, 2008 By MedNews Leave a Comment

A recent study by researchers at UT Southwestern Medical Center concludes that hormonal components in over-the-counter dietary supplements may actually accelerate the progression of prostate cancer, at the same time decreasing the effectiveness of anti-cancer drugs.

The study, published in the January 11, 2008 issue of Clinical Cancer Research, strongly advises patients to tell their doctor if they are taking any herbal or hormonal dietary supplements. It is also recommended that the use of such supplements is routinely documented as part of the patient’s health assessment.

"Physicians need to ask their patients not only about the prescription drugs they may be taking, but—perhaps even more importantly—about the over-the-counter drugs and supplements, which may have a profound impact on certain health conditions," said Dr. Claus Roehrborn, chairman of urology at UT Southwestern and one of the study’s authors.

The research commenced when two UT Southwestern patients developed aggressive prostate cancer mere months after starting daily use of the same dietary supplement—one for muscular development, the other for sexual enhancement. When Dr. Roehrborn and Dr.Shariat, a resident in urology and the study’s lead author, and their colleagues analyzed the product (not named in the study) they found that the label listed ingredients not present, misrepresented the concentrations of the ingredients that were present, and did not list all the steroid hormones in the product.

Hormone analysis showed the presence of testosterone and estradiol, a sex hormone. Testing of the product’s effect on human prostate cancer-cell lines revealed that the product was a more potent stimulator of cancer-cell growth than testosterone. Use of the anti-cancer drug bicalutamide, in increasing concentrations, proved ineffective.

"Bicalutamide is an oral nonsteroidal anti-androgen used to treat prostate cancer," Dr. Shariat said. "The fact that this supplement caused the drug to be less effective is very troubling." The researchers filed an adverse event report with the Food and Drug Administration, which in turn issued a warning letter to the manufacturer, who withdrew the product from the market.

"Unlike prescription and over-the-counter drugs, the law does not require nutritional supplements to undergo pre-market approval for safety and efficacy," Dr. Shariat said. "The current FDA regulatory system provides little oversight or assurances that dietary supplements will have predictable pharmacological effects or even that product labels provide accurate information for consumers."

It is estimated that 42% – 69% of U.S. adults use dietary supplements, at an estimated cost of $34 billion. People often use supplements in the belief that these natural products are safe and drug-free. The sale of androgenic steroids meanwhile is increasing exponentionally, with 2004 sales U.S. expenditures on testosterone supplements totalling an estimated $425 million.

"Given that testosterone supplements are in high demand, there is significant concern that supplements, in addition to the one we evaluated, may pose an urgent human health risk," Dr. Shariat said.

Researchers from Baylor College of Medicine in Houston also contributed to the research.

"The current FDA regulatory system provides little oversight or assurances that dietary supplements will have predictable pharmacological effects or even that product labels provide accurate information for consumers."

Filed Under: Cancer, General Health Tagged With: cancer, dietary supplements, obesity, prostate cancer

Infertility and Testicular Cancer Linked, Says Study

November 6, 2007 By MedNews Leave a Comment

University of California, San Francisco researchers have found that men with a history of infertility have a markedly increased risk of subsequently developing testicular cancer. The purpose of the study was to assess testicular cancer in infertile men usingna cohort study methodology.

More than 51,000 couples, drawn from 15 California infertility centers during the period 1965 and 1995, were evaluated for infertility. Male subjects’ medical records were linked to the California Cancer Registry, the cumulative Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Registry (SEER) for the State of California. Cancers preceding infertility were excluded from analysis, and the incidence of testicular cancer in this cohort was compared to age-matched men from the general population.

The study found that men from infertile couples were 60% more likely to develop testicular cancer than other men (standardized incidence ratio 1.695% confidence interval 1.2 to 2.2). This risk was relatively constant across all age strata.

Source: UroToday

Filed Under: Cancer, Sexual Health Tagged With: cancer, infertility, testicular cancer

Improved IMRT Cancer Treatment Reduces Radiation Exposure to Healthy Tissue

October 29, 2007 By MedNews Leave a Comment

Recent studies by researchers at Montefiore Medical Center have shown that improved IMRT (intensity modulated radiation therapy) treatment provides far better patient care than standard radiation procedures because it safeguards healthy tissue surrounding cancerous tumors.

"We compared treatment techniques for cancers of the lung, abdomen, pelvis and head and neck, and were able to quantify just how much better IMRT was for patients in the studies than conventional radiation therapy," said Shalom Kalnicki, MD, chairman of the Department of Radiation Oncology at Montefiore.

Using the new IMRT technology, oncologists can now deliver thousands of precisely focused beams of radiation that follow the exact contours of a cancerous tumor. Today’s standard therapy uses cross-firing X-ray beams, and is not nearly as accurate.

A study of lung cancer patients showed that the average dose of radiation to the esophagus is reduced by 20 percent, and reduced by 30 percent to the area of the lung most critical for breathing.

"By developing and carrying out a tailor-made IMRT treatment plan for each patient, we reduced significantly the chance of having radiation beams harm healthy lung tissue and therefore impaired breathing," said Dr. Kalnicki.

In another study, Montefiore researchers used IMRT technology to treat patients with pancreatic cancer. Radiation dosage to the nearby kidneys was reduced by 38 percent, and radiation dosage to the normal bowel was also reduced by 38 percent.

A third Montefiore study used image guided adoptive planning, another advanced form of IMRT, to treat complex-shaped head and neck cancers.

The salivary glands, mandible, nerves and oral cavity lining were dramatically safeguarded using this method, resulting in significant improvement of patient quality of life.

Source: Montefiore Medical Center

Filed Under: Cancer, Radiology Tagged With: cancer, IMRT, radiation

FDA Approves Bristol-Meyers Squibb’s Drug Ixempra for Breast Cancer Treatment

October 23, 2007 By MedNews Leave a Comment

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved Ixempra (ixabepilone), a new anti-cancer treatment, for use in patients with metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer who have not responded to certain other cancer drugs.

Ixempra is indicated as monotherapy for the treatment of metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer in patients whose tumors are resistant or refractory to anthracyclines, taxanes, and capecitabine.

"This approval is important because it provides certain patients with a new chemotherapy option in instances where other drugs have failed," said Douglas C. Throckmorton, M.D., deputy director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.

The FDA evaluated Ixempra under priority review, completing its assessment of the drug’s safety and effectiveness in six months.

Ixempra was approved for use in combination with another cancer drug, capecitabine, in patients who no longer benefit from two other chemotherapy treatments. These prior treatments included an anthracycline (such as doxorubicin or epirubicin) and a taxane (such as paclitaxel or docetaxel).

Ixempra was also approved for use alone in patients who no longer benefit from an anthracycline, a taxane and capecitabine.

According to the American Cancer Society, about 180,000 new cases of breast cancer are diagnosed each year in the United States. Metastatic breast cancer is the most advanced stage of breast cancer and has the potential to spread to almost any region of the body.

Ixempra has been shown to bind to cancer cell microtubules, which are structures within cells that help to support and shape them. Microtubules also play a role in cell division.

The safety and efficacy of Ixempra in combination with capecitabine were evaluated in 752 patients in a randomized clinical trial comparing the combination to capecitabine alone. This combination therapy demonstrated improvements in delaying cancer progression or death compared to capecitabine alone.

The safety and efficacy of Ixempra administered alone were evaluated in a study of 126 patients. Clinically significant tumor shrinkage occurred in 12 percent of the patients.

Ixempra’s significant side effects included peripheral neuropathy (numbness, tingling or burning in the hands or feet) and bone marrow suppression. Other commonly observed toxicities included constipation, nausea, vomiting, muscle paint, joint pain, fatigue and general weakness.

Women taking Ixempra should avoid taking drugs that are strong inhibitors of CYP3A4, one of the enzymes that metabolizes Ixempra.

Ixempra should not be taken by women who have had severe allergic reactions to drugs that contain Cremophor or its derivatives, or by women who have baseline bone marrow suppression determined by low white blood cell or platelet count.

The combination of Ixempra and capecitabine should not be given to patients with moderate or severe liver impairment due to the increased risk of toxicity and death.

Ixempra is administered by intravenous infusion. It is distributed by Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company, Princeton, New Jersey.

Source: FDA (October 22, 2007)

Filed Under: Cancer, Drug Approvals, FDA News & Alerts Tagged With: breast cancer, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, cancer, Ixempra

Three Alcohol Drinks Per Day May Significantly Increase Breast Cancer Risk

October 13, 2007 By MedNews Leave a Comment

It isn’t the type of alcohol but the quantity which increases a woman’s risk of contracting breast cancer.

In fact, the increased breast cancer risk from drinking three or more alcoholic drinks a day is similar to the increased breast cancer risk from smoking a pack of cigarettes or more a day, according to Kaiser Permanente researchers Yan Li, MD, PhD and Arthur Klatsky, MD.

"Population studies have consistently linked drinking alcohol to an increased risk of female breast cancer, but until now there has been little data, most of it conflicting, about an independent role played by the choice of beverage type," said Klatsky, who is presentied these findings on Sept. 27 at the European Cancer Conference (ECCO 14) in Barcelona, Spain.

The study found there was no difference between wine, beer or spirits in the risk of developing breast cancer. Even when wine was divided into red and white, there was no difference. However, when researchers looked at the relationship between breast cancer risk and total alcohol intake, they found that women who drank between one and two alcoholic drinks per day increased their risk of breast cancer by 10 percent compared with light drinkers who drank less than one drink a day. The risk of breast cancer increased by 30 percent in women who drank more than three drinks a day.

"A 30 percent increased risk is not trivial. To put it into context, it is not much different from the increased risk associated with women taking estrogenic hormones. Incidentally, in previous research completed at Kaiser Permanente, we have found that smoking a pack of cigarettes or more per day is related to a similar (30 percent) increased risk of breast cancer," Klatsky said.

Although breast cancer incidence varies between populations and only a small proportion of women are heavy drinkers, Dr Klatsky said that a 30 percent increase in the relative risk of breast cancer from heavy drinking might translate into approximately an extra 5 percent of all women developing breast cancer as a result of their habit.

"Klatsky said that all medical advice needed to be personalized to the individual. "Our findings provide more evidence for why heavy drinkers should quit or cut down."

Source: Kaiser

Filed Under: Alcohol, Cancer Tagged With: alcohol, breast cancer, cancer

Obesity linked to increased risk of esophageal cancer

October 12, 2007 By MedNews Leave a Comment

Writing in the aptly named online journal Gut, Australian researchers have discovered a disproportionate incidence of increased esophageal cancers in overweight individuals.

According to the researchers, those with a "body mass index (BMI) of 40 or more, were six times as likely than those with a BMI of between 18.25 and 25."

Gastric reflux increased the incidence of this cancer 5X, and combined with obesity, the risk increased 15X.

Men 50 years old and younger were particularly vulnerable.

Filed Under: Cancer, Diet & Weight Tagged With: cancer, esophageal cancer, obesity

Prostate Cancer Mortality Rate Lower with Surgery Than Other Treatment Options

October 9, 2007 By MedNews Leave a Comment

Prostate cancer patients who opt for radiation treatment, hormone therapy, observation, or other forms of treatment for localized prostate cancer have a higher rate of death within 10 years than patients who have undergone surgery for prostate cancer, according to a recent Swiss study, published in the Archives of Internal Medicine.

As there have not yet been any notable randomized trials for prostate cancer treatments, treatment decisions are currently strongly influenced by the patient and physicians’ personal perferences and experiences, say the study’s authors.

Researchers used data from the Geneva Cancer Registry to assess all 844 patients diagnosed with localized (not yet spread) prostate cancer in Geneva between 1989 and 1998.

Of those men, 158 received prostatectomy, or surgery to remove all or part of the prostate; 205 had radiation treatment (radiotherapy); 378 chose watchful waiting, which entails active follow-up and treatment if the disease progresses; 72 underwent hormone therapy; and 31 had another type of therapy.

After 10 years, survival rates were 83 percent for those who underwent surgery to remove the prostate (prostatectomy), 75 percent for radiation therapy, 72 percent for watchful waiting, 41 percent for hormone therapy and 71 percent for other treatments.

"At 10 years, patients treated with radiotherapy or watchful waiting had a significantly increased risk of death from prostate cancer compared with patients who underwent prostatectomy," the authors wrote.

The increased mortality associated with radiotherapy and watchful waiting was primarily observed in patients under 70 years of age and in patients with poorly differentiated tumors, or tumors that have certain cellular characteristics and are more likely to spread aggressively.

While the authors recognize that their study can be improved through randomized clinical trials, they noted that "until clinical trials provide conclusive evidence, physicians and patients should be informed of these results and their limitations."

Source: Archives of Internal Medicine  2007;167(18):1944-1950.

Filed Under: Cancer Tagged With: cancer, prostate cancer

New Breast Cancer Gene HMMR Found

October 8, 2007 By MedNews Leave a Comment

Researchers have found a new gene called HMMR that, when mutated, may lead to a significantly greater chance of developing breast cancer. The study was a collaboration of international researchers from Spain, Israel, and several U.S. organizations.

The HMMR gene is mutated in about 10% of the population, while two other genes related to breast cancer, BRCA1 and CRCA2, are mutated in only about 0.3% of the popuation. According to the study’s authors, it’s important to identify more common breast cancer-related genes so that targeting the gene for early detection will have a greater impact.

The method of identifying the HMMR gene began with computer modeling to identify genes that impact cancer development and to see how they interact with other genes. Starting with four known breast cancer-related genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM and CHEK2), researchers then showed that alterations of either BRCA1 or HMMR can lead to genetic instability and interfere with cell division.

To specifically understand whether variations in HMMR increased breast cancer risk, 923 women with breast cancer and similar women without breast cancer were analyzed in a study led by Gadi Rennert, M.D., director of the CHS National Cancer Control Center in Haifa, Israel. The results indicated that women in the study under 40 years of age with the HMMR variant (even after accounting for mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes), had a 2.7 times greater risk of developing breast cancer than women without the variation.

The study was conducted among a population of Ashkenazi Jewish women, who have a higher risk of breast cancer than other groups.

The findings were verified in two other studies conducted in New York–one among another group of Ashkenazi Jewish women with a family history of breast cancer but no identified BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, and a third study of Jewish women with and without breast cancer in New York. Overall, 2,475 women with breast cancer and 1,918 healthy women were studied in Israel and New York.

The findings indicated that incidence of breast cancer was 23% higher in women who had one copy of the genetic variant, and 46% higher in women who had two copies of the variant. Researchers also concluded that HMMR may be associated with early-onset breast cancer, as the women with the HMMR variant were diagnosed about one year earlier than the control group.

"Identifying genes involved in cancer in the general population is important, because not all of the causes of breast cancer have been found. Through discoveries such as this, someday we might be able to more precisely estimate a person’s risk of cancer based on their genes," says study author Laura Rozek, Ph.D., a postdoctoral research fellow at the University of Medical School.

The study was funded by the National Cancer Institute, the National Institutes of Health, the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, the Niehaus, Southworth, Weissenbach Foundation, and the Koodish Foundation.

Sources: Nature Genetics, doi:10.1038/ngxxxx and University of Michigan

Filed Under: Cancer Tagged With: breast cancer, cancer, genetics

Pregnancy After Breast Cancer

October 4, 2007 By MedNews Leave a Comment

While many women who go through breast cancer do so in their 50’s and are no longer considering childbirth, women who are treated for breast cancer at a younger age are often left wondering whether or not they will be able to have children afterwards.

Breast cancer treatments often involve chemotherapy regimens that can affect ovarian function, but according to Daniel F. Hayes, an M.D. and clinical director of the breast cancer oncology program at the University of Michigan, many women can still safely conceive after breast cancer treatments.

Fertility is certainly a concern for women undergoing breast cancer treatment and Dr. Hayes points out that fertility is definitely something that should be discussed before treatment. "That discussion is going to be specific for each patient," he notes, "because it depends how old she is, whether she should get chemotherapy, what kind of chemotherapy, and whether she cares about maintaining fertility."

Ovarian function can be affected by multiple factors in breast cancer treatment—particularly chemotherapy. While most chemotherapies negatively affect ovarian function, younger women have a better chance of regaining their periods after treatment than their older counterparts who may be closer to menopause.

Other therapies that affect fertility are the newer hormone-based therapies, which are often given for up to five years. To become pregnant, women would have to stop taking the hormone therapy for a period of time before conception. Dr. Hayes discourages this course however, because, he says, the benefits of the therapy are so great.

 Studies have shown that there should be little worry that breast cancer treatment therapies have an adverse effect on the newborn children. The risk of birth defects or miscarriages was not shown to be elevated among women who have undergone chemotherapy.

Some Breast Cancer Facts

  • Number of American breast cancer diagnosis in 2007: 180,510
  • U.S. deaths from breast cancer in 2007: 40,910
  • Breast cancer is the #3 leading cause of female deaths in the United States.
  • With early detection, breast cancer can be cured in 80 percent of women.
  • It is recommended that women over 50 get a mammogram every 12 months.
  • Never ignore a lump or change in the look or feel of your breast.

Filed Under: Cancer Tagged With: breast cancer, cancer, pregnancy

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Search



Tag Cloud

alcohol allergies alzheimers antibiotics breast cancer cancer Centers for Disease Control (CDC) children cholesterol dementia depression Diabetes diet drug abuse exercise fda flu food genetics geriatrics h1n1 heart heart attack heart disease high blood pressure HIV/AIDS hormone therapy hypertension lungs menopause NIH obesity pain pediatrics pregnancy prostate cancer seniors sleep smoking statistics stroke sun teens USA women's health

Recent Comments

  • Mia Fritz on Health Benefits of Dark Chocolate
  • Shilpa on Why Too Much Iron Can Be Dangerous
  • Racheal on Teen Pregnancy May Be Reduced by Sex Education in Schools, Says Study
  • Don on Prilosec, Nexium and Prevacid Tied to Higher Risk of Pneumonia
  • Meso on Brain Changes in Elderly Can Affect Mobility and Balance
  • About Us
  • Contact

Copyright © 2025 Mednews · Log in